home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- Path: ix.netcom.com!netnews
- From: miker3@ix.netcom.com (Mike Rubenstein)
- Newsgroups: comp.lang.ada,comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c,comp.lang.modula3,comp.lang.modula2,comp.lang.eiffel
- Subject: Re: Hungarian notation
- Date: Fri, 26 Jan 1996 03:04:17 GMT
- Organization: Netcom
- Message-ID: <310842ad.6002240@nntp.ix.netcom.com>
- References: <30C40F77.53B5@swsbbs.com> <4d2ok0$69s@beach.and.nl> <4dtv3gINNo9u@keats.ugrad.cs.ubc.ca> <SPENCER.96Jan22113215@zorgon.ERA.COM> <4e1nd8$hv0@solutions.solon.com> <3104bfc8.132251392@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <dewar.822407919@schonberg> <3106260f.224013120@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <4e6oj9$o02@news.xmission.com> <31077335.52859072@nntp.ix.netcom.com> <JSA.96Jan25190824@organon.com>
- NNTP-Posting-Host: ix-dc14-03.ix.netcom.com
- X-NETCOM-Date: Thu Jan 25 7:04:26 PM PST 1996
- X-Newsreader: Forte Agent .99c/16.141
-
- jsa@organon.com (Jon S Anthony) wrote:
-
- > In article <31077335.52859072@nntp.ix.netcom.com> miker3@ix.netcom.com (Mike Rubenstein) writes:
- >
- > > I think you're reading something into my post that isn't there.
- > >
- > > What am I reading into the standard that's not there? Nothing in my
- > > post suggests that defining the result as always 0 is illegal. In
- > > fact, it is clearly legal.
- > >
- > > But the standard does impose some restrictions on the definition. The
- > > definition must specify that the subject type is converted to the
- > > object type. It must not produce side-effects.
- > >
- > > Please reread my post; I was responding to the statement that the
- > > definition could be to delete the system disk. That is out of bounds
- > > for the definition and I said so. I did not say that defining the
- > > result to be 0 is out of bounds.
- >
- > Face it. You just plain got it wrong. Deleting the system disk is
- > perfectly within bounds. Stupid, for sure, as no one in their right
- > mind would use such a compiler, but perfectly legal.
-
- Please cite anything in the standard that supports your position. I
- can find nothing in the standard that gives an implementation that
- license.
-
- Insults do not prove a point -- quotes from the standard do. I've
- shown the passages that support my position.
-
-
- Michael M Rubenstein
-